Proposal Evaluation Rubric

Student Name*
Proposal Title*
Defense Outcome
Chapter 1: Problem Statement
Chapter 1: Problem Statement
10 points
The problem statement is thoroughly presented; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated thoroughly; the student has created a strong argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership.

8-9 points
The problem statement is generally presented; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated generally; the student has created a reasonable argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership.

6-7 points
The problem statement is acceptably presented; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated in an acceptable manner; the student has created an acceptable argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership.

1-5 points
The problem statement is presented superficially or incompletely; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated in a superficial or incomplete manner; the student has created a superficial or incomplete argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership.
Chapter 1 Score*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
10 points
The literature review is comprehensive and includes: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research developed into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study.

8-9 points
The literature review is generally thorough and includes: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study.

6-7 points
The literature review is acceptably thorough and includes: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study.

1-5 points
The literature review is not comprehensive and addresses the following superficially or incompletely: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study.
Chapter 2 Score*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
10 points
A completely thorough discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is explained clearly, and is appropriate to the research questions or hypotheses.

8-9 points
A generally thorough discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is explained clearly, and is appropriate to the research questions or hypotheses.

6-7 points
An acceptable discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is explained clearly, and is appropriate to the research questions or hypotheses.

1-5 points
The discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is not explained clearly, and is superficial or inappropriate to the research questions or hypotheses.
Chapter 3 Score*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Final Draft Grammar and Mechanics
10 points
Few to no surface errors; the errors that occur do not subtract from the meaning of the paper.

8-9 points
Surface errors are minimal.

6-7 points
Apparent surface errors that do not substantially interfere with the meaning.

1-5 points
Numerous surface errors that interfere with reading the paper.
Grammar and Mechanics Score*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Oral Defense
10 points
The defense was well-prepared, organized, and guided the participants through the proposed study, addressing all questions with efficiency.

8-9 points
The defense was well-organized and prepared, but there were some hesitation when asked proving questions regarding the study.

6-7 points
The presentation provided a cursory overview of the proposed study, but left participants unsure of the exact nature of the study or the proposed process.

1-5 points
The presentation showed a lack of thorough preparation, and an inability to answer inquiries regarding the proposed study.
Oral Defense Score*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Total Score
Confirmation
By entering your first and last name, you confirm that the information you have entered is accurate.
Your First and Last Name*
Date*
MM slash DD slash YYYY

)