Dissertation Rubric Student Name* Dissertation Title* Defense OutcomePassConditional – DefendConditional – Non-DefendUnsatisfactory (Failure)Chapter 1: Problem StatementChapter 1: Problem Statement 10 points The problem statement is thoroughly presented; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated thoroughly; the student has created a strong argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership. 8-9 points The problem statement is generally presented; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated generally; the student has created a reasonable argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership. 6-7 points The problem statement is acceptably presented; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated in an acceptable manner; the student has created an acceptable argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership. 1-5 points The problem statement is presented superficially or incompletely; relationships between concepts, frameworks, models, and variables are articulated in a superficial or incomplete manner; the student has created a superficial or incomplete argument that this body of work will enhance the scholarship of global leadership. Chapter 1 Score*Please enter a number from 1 to 10.Chapter 2: Literature Review 10 points The literature review is comprehensive and includes: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research developed into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study. 8-9 points The literature review is generally thorough and includes: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study. 6-7 points The literature review is acceptably thorough and includes: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study. 1-5 points The literature review is not comprehensive and addresses the following superficially or incompletely: the status of the topic being researched; the synthesis of research into a question that will add value to existing scholarship; gaps in research related to the topic being studied; a theoretical framework for the study. Chapter 2 Score*Please enter a number from 1 to 10.Chapter 3: Research Methodology 10 points A completely thorough discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is explained clearly, and is appropriate to the research questions or hypotheses. 8-9 points A generally thorough discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is explained clearly, and is appropriate to the research questions or hypotheses. 6-7 points An acceptable discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is explained clearly, and is appropriate to the research questions or hypotheses. 1-5 points The discussion of the research methodology and its suitability for the study is not explained clearly, and is superficial or inappropriate to the research questions or hypotheses. Chapter 3 Score*Please enter a number from 1 to 10.Chapter 4: Results 10 points The results are thoroughly presented and clearly explained in a way that thoroughly describes the relationships in the data and their accurate interpretation for the study’s objective and for future research. 8-9 points The results are generally presented and explained in a way that generally describes the relationships in the data and their accurate interpretation for the study’s objective and for future research. 6-7 points The results are acceptably presented and explained in a way that acceptably describes the relationships in the data and their accurate interpretation for the study’s objective and for future research. 1-5 points The results are presented and explained in a way that superficially or incompletely describes the relationships in the data and their accurate interpretation for the study’s objective and for future research. Chapter 4 Score*Please enter a number from 1 to 10.Chapter 5: Discussion of Results and Implications for Future Research 10 points The discussion of results and implications for future research contains a complete analysis from a variety of scholarly perspectives; results are completely described; limitations and their consequences for results and for future research are thoroughly provided with evidence of standards of global leadership. 8-9 points The discussion of results and implications for future research contains a generally complete analysis from a variety of scholarly perspectives; results are generally described; limitations and their consequences for results and for future research are generally provided with evidence of standards of global leadership. 6-7 points The discussion of results and implications for future research contains an acceptable analysis from a variety of scholarly perspectives; results are described; limitations and their consequences for results and for future research are acceptably provided with evidence of standards of global leadership. 1-5 points The discussion of results and implications for future research contains an incomplete or superficial analysis from a variety of scholarly perspectives; results are not completely described; limitations and their consequences results and for future research are not provided with evidence of standards of global leadership. Chapter 5 Score*Please enter a number from 1 to 10.Final Presentation Grammar and Mechanics 10 points Few to no surface errors; the errors that occur do not subtract from the meaning of the paper. 8-9 points Surface errors are minimal. 6-7 points Apparent surface errors that do not substantially interfere with the meaning. 1-5 points Numerous surface errors that interfere with reading the paper. Final Presentation Score*Please enter a number from 1 to 10.Total ScoreConfirmationBy entering your first and last name, you confirm that the information you have entered is accurate.Your First and Last Name* Date* MM slash DD slash YYYY